Sound Off for October 9th: Should gun manufacturers be responsible for crimes committed with weapons?
An appeals court in New York has ruled that a former high school athlete who was shot in 2003 can sue the companies that made and distributed the handgun used in the crime.
The ruling reverses a lower court's dismissal of Buffalo victim Daniel Williams' complaint. Williams claimed Ohio gun maker Hi-Point and distributor MKS Supply intentionally supplied handguns to irresponsible dealers for profit.
The gun used to shoot Williams was bought at a gun show by a Buffalo gun trafficker.
The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence praised the decision to let the case move forward, saying it means gun companies that supply the criminal market are not above the law.
But, Hi-Point attorney Scott Allan says Hi-Point only sells guns to federally licensed distributors and complied with all statutes.
Do you feel the gun manufacturer should be held liable for crimes committed with its weapons?
Comment below or e-mail us at email@example.com.
© 2012 KXLY.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without prior permission.